Skip to main content

Publications

Below is a sample of our current publications:

2024:

  • Imhoff, R., Meuer, M., Oeberst, A. & Mokros, A. (2024). Gibt es organisierten rituellen Kindesmissbrauch? InMind, 2. de.in-mind.org/article/gibt-es-organisierten-rituellen-kindesmissbrauch 
  • Mokros, A., Schemmel, J., Körner, A., Oeberst, A., Imhoff, R., Suchotzki, K., Oberlader, V., Banse, R., Kannegießer, A., Gubi-Kelm, S., Lehmann, R. & Volbert, R. (2024). Rituelle sexuelle Gewalt: Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit fragwürdigen empirischen Belegen für ein fragliches Phänomen [Ritual sexual violence: A critical appraisal of dubious empirical evidence for a doubtful phenomenon]. Psychologische Rundschau [Vorab-Onlinepublikation].  https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000663
  • Oeberst, A. & Ridderbecks, T. (2024). Self-selection: How article category in Wikipedia determines the heterogeneity of its authors. Scientific Reports, 14, 740. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50448-y 
  • Krebs, M.-C., Oeberst, A.* & von der Beck, I. (2024). The wisdom of the crowd is not a foregone conclusion. Effects of Self-Selection on (collaborative) knowledge construction. Topics in Cognitive Science, 16(2), 206-224. doi.org./10.1111/tops.12647  *shared first authorship 

2023:

  • Oeberst, A., & Imhoff, R. (2023). Towards parsimony in bias research. Proposing a common framework of belief-consistent information processing. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 18(6), 1464-1487. doi.org/10.1177/17456916221148147
  • Meuer, M., Nestler, S., & Oeberst, A. (2023). What determines hindsight bias in written work? One field and three experimental studies in the context of Wikipedia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 29(2), 239-258. doi.org/10.1037/xap0000445  
  • Wachendörfer, M. M., & Oeberst, A. (2023). Differences Between True and False Autobiographical Memories. European Psychologist, 28(4), 247–264. doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000513
  • Jacobs, S., Schnepf, J., Wachendörfer, M.M., & Oeberst, A. (2023). Auswirkungen impliziter Plausibilitätserwartungen über das Nachtatverhalten von Vergewaltigungsopfern auf die Glaubwürdigkeits- und Glaubhaftigkeitsbeurteilung durch Laien. Rechtspsychologie, 9(4), 468–489. doi.org/10.5771/2365-1083-2023-4-468

2022:

  • Meuer, M., Oeberst, A., & Imhoff, R. (2022). How do conspiratorial explanations differ from non-conspiratorial explanations? A content analysis of real-world online articles. European Journal of Social Psychology, 53(2), 288-306. doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2903
  • Oeberst, A., & Goeckenjan, I. (2022). May a witness challenge the conviction? (Some) Confirmation bias in law students and judges. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, 16, 293-299. doi.org/10.1007/s11757-022-00738-4  
  • Meuthen, D., & Oeberst, A. (2022). Does word order predict ethnocentric helping behavior? Results of a ‘lost letter’ field experiment in Berlin. Journal of Articles in Support of the Null-Hypothesis, 18, 57-66.